poyoffers.blogg.se - Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit

#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit for free#
#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit how to#
#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit software#
#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit code#

Now that I was confident that there were sufficient free tools and learning resources out there, one big question remained: who was going to teach millions of learners for free? Badges, like Khan Academy’s pictured above, are a deceptively powerful incentive for spurring intrinsic motivation in learners.

#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit code#

I talked to a lot of people who learned to code outside of university, and a majority of them had also done so exclusively using free tools and resources. I’d worked through free courses on Udacity and Coursera, coded in open source programming languages for thousands of hours using an unregistered (free) copy of Sublime, held hundreds of pair programming sessions over Skype and Team Viewer, coordinated projects and hackathon teams with Trello and HipChat, and hosted dozens of websites on Heroku, all for free.

#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit for free#

That’s right - I was an educated middle class Californian, and even I had opted for free resources over paid. One thing that immediately struck me was that all of these tools and resources had been free. I looked at the tools I’d used to organize projects and pair program. I looked at all the tools I’d used to write and deploy code.

#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit software#

I looked at the online courses I’d used in 2012, after leaving my career as a school director to become a software engineer. I’d recently read Chris Anderson’s “Free - The Radical Price of the Future” and Jeremy Rifkin’s “Zero Marginal Cost Society.” So I knew about the falling marginal costs of content and technology. (Photo credit: Steve Pfost) Getting to Free

#Is teamviewer free for a nonprofit how to#

Great! So I just needed to build an online coding bootcamp that could serve millions of people and was entirely free.Ĭhallenge accepted! Millions of Americans can and should learn how to code, but traditional coding bootcamps aren’t necessarily the best solution for them.

There was only one for sure way to remove socio-economic considerations: make it 100% free.

It should be inclusive rather than “selective”, and open to everyone regardless age, sex, race, country of origin, or English proficiency.

It should be fully online so that busy people with families, and people outside of the US, could participate.

The world needed a coding bootcamp that helped everyone else. The typical coding bootcamp demographic - 20-something men. Which means that coding bootcamps are mainly addressing a demographic that constitutes less than 1% of the Americans who could ultimately benefit from learning to code.Īnd, of course, another 95% of humanity is unable to attend these US-based bootcamps for economic- or immigration-related reasons. And only 1/3 of those people have college degrees. There are about 10 million Americans males aged 25–29.

The most striking thing I discovered about coding bootcamps is this: A majority of bootcamp participants are single male college graduates in their mid 20s. So I started meeting with bootcamp founders and bootcamp graduates, and breaking down their curricula and teaching methodologies. So we dismissed the idea and moved on.īut that conversation got me thinking about coding bootcamps. We might break even, but we would never catch up with the bootcamp chains that are owned by for-profit university conglomerates. How could a tiny new bootcamp succeed in such a fragmented market? If we charged the average bootcamp fee of $15,000 per person and accepted 100 learners a year, we could probably afford to rent office space in San Francisco to serve as our “campus”, buy some Ikea furniture, publicize ourselves with online advertisement, and teach the learners ourselves. Maybe we should build a bootcamp!īut there were more than 100 bootcamps in the US alone. In a signing-off Skype meeting, one of us brought up coding bootcamps. But it was clear that most learners needed more than a custom curriculum of courses. Yong, Dom and I then tried a number of things to boost engagement, including user experience overhauls and a gamification system. I’d built up the core technology over the past year. Our product was an online course recommendation engine that took into account both where you were (your education background and work history), and where you wanted to go (we had 25 technical career fields from which to choose).

In early October 2014, my friends Yong Park, Dominique Schuwey and I decided to disband our project.